General
Shayna Jack scared and paranoid, Court of Arbitration for Sport documents show
The Court of Arbitration for Sport has published its decision in the Shayna Jack case, revealing that the Australian swimmer described herself as “scared” and “paranoid” during the hearing.
Key points:
- Available evidence could not determine whether Jack had intentionally or unintentionally ingested Ligandrol
- There was no evidence of long term use of an anabolic agent
- Jack said the positive finding “killed” her and that she “wanted to be a positive role model”
Last week the Court announced the decision to reduce a four-year ban to two after Jack tested positive to Ligandrol in 2019.
The most revealing aspect of the hearing was the evidence given by an expert called by Sport Integrity Australia.
Professor Mario Thevis is the Vice President of…
-
General21 hours agoRBA governor Bullock says a severe market downturn would raise financial stability concerns
-
Noosa News24 hours agoWhy Cam Green staying at No.3 could help get the best out of Steve Smith during the 2025/26 Ashes
-
General22 hours agoThousands of US flights delayed as shutdown bites
-
General21 hours agoACT ‘beginning to see change’ two years on from the introduction of drug decriminalisation laws