General
Shayna Jack scared and paranoid, Court of Arbitration for Sport documents show
The Court of Arbitration for Sport has published its decision in the Shayna Jack case, revealing that the Australian swimmer described herself as “scared” and “paranoid” during the hearing.
Key points:
- Available evidence could not determine whether Jack had intentionally or unintentionally ingested Ligandrol
- There was no evidence of long term use of an anabolic agent
- Jack said the positive finding “killed” her and that she “wanted to be a positive role model”
Last week the Court announced the decision to reduce a four-year ban to two after Jack tested positive to Ligandrol in 2019.
The most revealing aspect of the hearing was the evidence given by an expert called by Sport Integrity Australia.
Professor Mario Thevis is the Vice President of…
-
Noosa News22 hours agoFarmers call for policy reform across multiple sectors as productivity collapses
-
General23 hours agoStar Wars’ fascist dystopia has never felt closer than in new season of Andor
-
Business23 hours agoHere’s the average Australian superannuation balance at age 60
-
General18 hours agoCoomalie council dismissed by NT government after investigation finds ‘serious deficiencies’