General
Shayna Jack scared and paranoid, Court of Arbitration for Sport documents show
The Court of Arbitration for Sport has published its decision in the Shayna Jack case, revealing that the Australian swimmer described herself as “scared” and “paranoid” during the hearing.
Key points:
- Available evidence could not determine whether Jack had intentionally or unintentionally ingested Ligandrol
- There was no evidence of long term use of an anabolic agent
- Jack said the positive finding “killed” her and that she “wanted to be a positive role model”
Last week the Court announced the decision to reduce a four-year ban to two after Jack tested positive to Ligandrol in 2019.
The most revealing aspect of the hearing was the evidence given by an expert called by Sport Integrity Australia.
Professor Mario Thevis is the Vice President of…
Continue Reading
-
Business16 hours agoThis ASX 200 healthcare stock crashed 14% to 4-year low. Here’s what happened
-
Business20 hours agoThis leading broker thinks the CSL share price can climb 40%
-
Business12 hours agoDicker Data rides the AI trend to double digit growth
-
Noosa News20 hours agoOld Translink app canned, and new version ‘worse than paper map from 2015’