General
Shayna Jack scared and paranoid, Court of Arbitration for Sport documents show
The Court of Arbitration for Sport has published its decision in the Shayna Jack case, revealing that the Australian swimmer described herself as “scared” and “paranoid” during the hearing.
Key points:
- Available evidence could not determine whether Jack had intentionally or unintentionally ingested Ligandrol
- There was no evidence of long term use of an anabolic agent
- Jack said the positive finding “killed” her and that she “wanted to be a positive role model”
Last week the Court announced the decision to reduce a four-year ban to two after Jack tested positive to Ligandrol in 2019.
The most revealing aspect of the hearing was the evidence given by an expert called by Sport Integrity Australia.
Professor Mario Thevis is the Vice President of…
Continue Reading
-
General18 hours agoIran’s currency at record low as tensions run high
-
Noosa News24 hours agoDisaster relief packages announced for flood-stricken western Queensland
-
General24 hours ago307,000 Voices | The Spectator Australia
-
General24 hours agoLive and dead animals seized from Kyneton business after investigation