Sport
Biting’s outside the NRL’s unwritten laws about acceptable ways to harm an opponent — and it means Kevin Proctor’s in trouble – ABC News
It’s usually about the impact, not the act, when a player is placed on report and appears before the NRL judiciary — but biting triggers a different response, writes Richard Hinds.
In the courts of footy justice, as in life, both punishment and perception are now all about the consequences.
When a player is placed on report, match review committees spend as much time studying the victim’s medical report as they do the video of the wallop that sent him to la-la land.
A stray elbow that leaves a player concussed might mean a two-week ban. A similar action that inflicts no trauma might attract only a fine.
The anomaly is obvious. Surely the penalty should be dependent on t…
-
General10 hours agoAlleged Croydon Park gunman Artemios Mintzas charged with 25 offences
-
General24 hours agoThree youths in police custody after fire at Ashley Youth Detention Centre in northern Tasmania
-
General24 hours agoLiberal poll blow days after MP’s retreat to backbench
-
Noosa News17 hours agoYork family honours late son with tractor museum to fund cancer research