Health
The insurance implications arising from the new study reporting that SARS-COV-20 can remain for 28+ days – Lexology
One argument that insurers are making in resisting coverage under their property insurance policies for losses associated with COVID-19 is that there…
One argument that insurers are making in resisting coverage under their property insurance policies for losses associated with COVID-19 is that there is no permanent loss or damage to property. They note that SARS-CoV-2 remains in the air only a few hours and on surfaces for no more than a few days. They argue that there is no coverage for such “temporary” events.
A new peer-reviewed article regarding the duration of SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces undercuts insurer arguments about just how “temporary…
-
Noosa News23 hours agoDeath of German shepherd Arnie prompts Brisbane community action to protect pets caught up in crime
-
General16 hours agoARIA Awards 2025 winners: Amyl & The Sniffers and Ninajirachi dominate
-
Noosa News16 hours agoPolice officer who tracked Toyah Cordingley’s phone gives evidence at Rajwinder Singh’s murder trial
-
Noosa News23 hours agoFrank Moneger identified as man accused of hit-and-run death of 17-year-old girl in Margate, Queensland