Health
The insurance implications arising from the new study reporting that SARS-COV-20 can remain for 28+ days – Lexology
One argument that insurers are making in resisting coverage under their property insurance policies for losses associated with COVID-19 is that there…
One argument that insurers are making in resisting coverage under their property insurance policies for losses associated with COVID-19 is that there is no permanent loss or damage to property. They note that SARS-CoV-2 remains in the air only a few hours and on surfaces for no more than a few days. They argue that there is no coverage for such “temporary” events.
A new peer-reviewed article regarding the duration of SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces undercuts insurer arguments about just how “temporary…
-
General19 hours agoAustralia’s native flora emerges as an increasingly popular muse for bonsai hobbyists
-
Noosa News17 hours agoFears for the future of retro Chinese dining after blaze guts Sundoo in Townsville
-
Noosa News22 hours agoOn your marks, get set, buy!
-
Business22 hours agoTop brokers name 3 ASX shares to buy next week 25 May 2025