Noosa News
Judge slaps down Palmer court case as ‘hopeless’ and a ‘beat-up’

According to court documents, after the case they relied upon fell over in September 2020, lawyers for QNI Metals and QNI Resources decided to withdraw their application on March 26.
However, the parties could not agree on costs. The liquidators wanted indemnity costs, which were broader and more valuable, but QNI Metals and QNI Resources wanted to pay only standard costs.
Queensland Supreme Court Justice John Bond, who oversaw both applications involving the parties, concluded the case met the requirements for the wider-ranging indemnity costs to be enforced.
“The essence of the respondents’ [the liquidators’] argument for indemnity costs was that the applicants’ [QNI Metals’ and QNI Resources’] case was always hopeless and…
-
Noosa News23 hours ago
Queensland weather forecast sees sunny weather for last week of winter
-
Business21 hours ago
Why the Betashares Nasdaq 100 ETF could be a perfect buy and hold pick
-
General23 hours ago
Energy provider ENGIE to ‘correct’ electricity bills for thousands of South Australian customers
-
Business22 hours ago
Does Macquarie rate BHP shares a buy after its FY25 results?