Health
The insurance implications arising from the new study reporting that SARS-COV-20 can remain for 28+ days – Lexology
One argument that insurers are making in resisting coverage under their property insurance policies for losses associated with COVID-19 is that there…
One argument that insurers are making in resisting coverage under their property insurance policies for losses associated with COVID-19 is that there is no permanent loss or damage to property. They note that SARS-CoV-2 remains in the air only a few hours and on surfaces for no more than a few days. They argue that there is no coverage for such “temporary” events.
A new peer-reviewed article regarding the duration of SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces undercuts insurer arguments about just how “temporary…
-
General17 hours agoARIA Awards 2025 winners: Amyl & The Sniffers and Ninajirachi dominate
-
Noosa News17 hours agoPolice officer who tracked Toyah Cordingley’s phone gives evidence at Rajwinder Singh’s murder trial
-
General19 hours agoPerth man charged after investigation into organised crime and tobacco store attacks
-
General24 hours agoCrowe toasts talkback titan for platforming ‘voiceless’