Health
The insurance implications arising from the new study reporting that SARS-COV-20 can remain for 28+ days – Lexology
One argument that insurers are making in resisting coverage under their property insurance policies for losses associated with COVID-19 is that there…
One argument that insurers are making in resisting coverage under their property insurance policies for losses associated with COVID-19 is that there is no permanent loss or damage to property. They note that SARS-CoV-2 remains in the air only a few hours and on surfaces for no more than a few days. They argue that there is no coverage for such “temporary” events.
A new peer-reviewed article regarding the duration of SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces undercuts insurer arguments about just how “temporary…
-
Noosa News14 hours agoBanana farmers still salvaging fruit four weeks after ex-Tropical Cyclone Alfred
-
Noosa News14 hours agoQueen Street Mall to get a 3D digital billboard; Dutton dumps controversial plans to end flexible work; Measles alert for tourist hotspots
-
Business19 hours agoBattle of the ASX ETFs: Why has VGS outperformed VTS this year?
-
Business18 hours ago5 things to watch on the ASX 200 on Monday 7 April 2025